Search for: "Chem Advances L L C" Results 1 - 20 of 20
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2007, 2:22 am
DWI offenses First Act: 04/25/07 REFERRED TO TRANSPORTATION Last Act: 04/25/07 REFERRED TO TRANSPORTATION S5551 LANZA -- Relates to arson in the first degree Same as A 5248 BLURB : Pen L. arson in the first degree First Act: 04/25/07 REFERRED TO CODES Last Act: 04/25/07 REFERRED TO CODES S5554 SKELOS -- Designates as peace officers, employees of the Nassau county correctional facility, who are… [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 12:36 am
OMRDD worker registry Last Act: 02/26/07 referred to mental health LAW / CORRECTNSA5911 Tedisco (MS) -- Requires department of motor vehicles to provide police officers with information on level 3 sex offenders based on license or registration inquiry BLURB : V & T L. level 3 sex offenders Last Act: 02/26/07 referred to transportation LAW / CORRECTNSA5944 McDonough (MS) -- Requires school bus stops not to be located near the residences of sex offenders BLURB : Ed… [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
A controlled substance named or described in s. 893.03(1)(a), (1)(b), (1)(d), (2)(a), (2)(b), or (2)(c) 4., commits a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084 [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 8:57 pm
Int'l, Inc., 522 F.3d 1279, 1295-96 (Fed. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 11:27 am by admin
The MDL court noted that both sides had cited Borenstein’s textbook on meta-analysis,[27] and that Wells had himself cited the Cochrane Handbook[28] for the basic proposition that that objective and scientifically valid study selection criteria should be clearly stated in advance to ensure the objectivity of the analysis. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
This new article of mine will be coming out next year in the Journal of Law and Religion, and I thought I'd serialize it here; there's still plenty of time for editing, so I'd love to hear people's feedback. [read post]
6 Sep 2009, 11:46 pm
" The MPEP states: Definiteness of claim language must be analyzed, not in a vacuum, but in light of: (A) The content of the particular application disclosure; (B) The teachings of prior art; and (C) The claim interpretation that would be given by one possessing the ordinary level of skill in the pertinent art at the time the invention was made. [read post]